(C O P Y)
Opinion of Sir Henry Berkeley of 7th.
August, 190S.
46
Under paragraph 4 of the Circular of December 1894 lands
and buildings surrendered to the Colonial Government by the far Department are to be sold in the "open marxet" and "the proceels"
of the sale are to be paid into the Colonial freasury to a special
account to the debit of the Colonial Government, that which is to
be paid into the Treasury is the sum paid by the purchaser at the
sale in open market, i.e. the proceeds of the sale. In the words of
the paragraph 4 "the proceeds" of the sale are to be paid into the
Treasury and debited to the Colonial Governrent. The proceels of
a sale are the moneys actually realised by the sale in the pre-
sent case the proceeds would be what is locally called the
"premiums" paid to Government for the Crown Lease of the lands the
leasehold interest in which has been sold. It is therefore only
the premium, that is to say, the proceeds of the sale which is to
be paid into the Treasury and debited to the Colonial Government.
Under paragraph 4 the War Department have no claim to rent in res-
pect of the surrendered lands, for the Department has not under
that paragraph, as it has under paragraph 9 when the Government
retains any land surrendered, a right to regard such lands as if
they were War Department lands in fee simple. It is the right, con-
ferred by paragraph 6, to be credited with the market value of the
fee simple which entities the War Department to capitalize rent
plus premium in cases coming under that paragraph. No such right
exists under paragraph 4: therefore in cases coming under that paragraph the War Department is entitled to be credited with the sum of money actually realised by the sale in open market and
nothing core.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.